tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043982707918893775.post8578662935332828697..comments2024-02-14T02:01:30.301-08:00Comments on White Noise: Lectures on Philosophy – Madhva PhilosophyAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00085959273817005617noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043982707918893775.post-3214534204498691592008-07-18T08:34:00.000-07:002008-07-18T08:34:00.000-07:00@takaal.. i don't have the exact answer to your qu...@takaal.. <BR/>i don't have the exact answer to your question, but i guess it has to do with the souls being eternal, and having some kind of intrinsic memory called Svabhava. <BR/>there has to be some memory, man.. think God keeps tab.. :)<BR/>i bet that this question would have been asked by people before..<BR/>i need to start looking at some Madhva pages.. for a more particular answer..<BR/>i keep telling myself, it will be one of these days..<BR/>let's see..Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00085959273817005617noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043982707918893775.post-81602936560125560002008-07-18T06:45:00.000-07:002008-07-18T06:45:00.000-07:00If I can't remember what my previous life was in m...If I can't remember what my previous life was in my next janma, what is the use of Mukthi?. If ever the concept of Mukthi was true(which is not), I wouldn't want it. I would want to exist in this world, and enjoy it as much as I can. <BR/><BR/>As Laplace said "I don't need the hypothesis of God".Rakesh Babu G Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04967077176793122103noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043982707918893775.post-89985372135087171012008-07-04T07:34:00.000-07:002008-07-04T07:34:00.000-07:00Well, these are my problems with the madhva philos...Well, these are my problems with the madhva philosophy :<BR/><BR/>1. Theistic: God, :?. Ok, let me pass this assumption by assuming that he is referring it as a symbol for absolute reality. I can't accept this if God there is some kinda supreme-human being.<BR/><BR/>2. The world is real. What we see are real. Clean, but are they absolute? I still give heed to lot of new age theories which suggest we can make our own realities. What bout hallucinations then, are they not real?? <BR/><BR/>3. Assuming bedha is real is downright ridiculous and there is no justification.<BR/><BR/>4. Mukti, ok for once let us assume that we attain mukthi when we are aware of the reality.<BR/><BR/>5. devotion?? what the heck? no other way? :)<BR/><BR/>I don't beleive even advaita is true. Infact, these are interpretations of vedas which are deemed unquestionable. But the problem is no one can udnerstand them ( it is not direct, and full of abstractions) , so ppl make up their own interpretations and fight over them ( advaita v/s dvaita).<BR/><BR/>I am against "seeing is believing to be real", people know how reality has worked counter-intuitively in all these years of pure science.<BR/><BR/>There should be other ways...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com